Posts Tagged ‘insurance’
Is this what it takes?
We have all been captivated in the aftermath of Brian Thompson’s brazen murder in New York. As the news was announced, many speculated that the gunman was either a frustrated United Healthcare customer or hired by one. As we have seen in the last few days, the apprehended suspect did, indeed, face debilitating pain, though the details of his medical journey have not been made public.
Beyond the reckless gun violence that seems to define our country, we like to think of our society as a morally ethical one. We are a democracy, with laws in place to punish crimes like this, including the vigilante crimes that to some seem justifiable. In the end, this was a murder, the premeditated killing of a human being, and this is without a question wrong.
Some have called the murderer a hero. By this argument, United Healthcare is an evil corporation, and killing the CEO is a statement against all that the insurer has done to harm its customers.
The murderer is no hero.
Whatever the outcome of a trial, however, we cannot deny that the murder has brightened the spotlight on much that is wrong with healthcare in the United States. Despite the high premiums we pay for health insurance, the process of getting medical care approved and funded can seem nearly impossible, especially for those who need it the most.
I have read many arguments in response to discussions lately that insurance is not intended to cover normal care… and in fact, I remember a time, years ago, when this was true. When I was little, my mom wrote a check to the doctor for ordinary visits. Ha! So long ago! Private pay feels quaint now–or exclusive, limited to the private care psychiatrists, med-spas, membership concierge practices. In reality, ordinary healthcare, even one office visit, is largely unaffordable without insurance, and still unpredictable despite pricing transparency laws that have gone into effect since 2021. Reduced prices negotiated for health insurance plans create a two- (or more) tier system with much higher prices for those who want to pay out of pocket.
Insurance or not, the research and study involved in making predictions about costs for care are overwhelming, and harder still to navigate while sick or injured. People are talking about this loudly again, with media coverage and attention from Congress. Anger today is palpable, as if we just realized that the countless hours we spend on hold with our insurers are the experience of nearly everyone, and not isolated incidents. Protests, strikes, marches all seem overdue, but demonstrations have seemed so ineffective to the monstrosity of a system where the decision-makers seem so cut off from ordinary people.
For the last fifteen years, I have seen firsthand that for most people, often very sick people, it is not the illness or condition that is the primary point of suffering; it is the maneuvering necessary to secure treatment and payment for that treatment. How horrible is that?
Worry about payment shocks and all too often, bankrupts people who get sick. Many of us have delayed or deferred care that was not urgent, often due to cost, either defined or potential, and most of us now have fought at least one battle to have our care approved. Copays for ongoing treatment often are a barrier, though some ongoing therapies may cost far less in the long run–and improve quality of life overall. Ordinary devices and services could improve life for so many, but think of all that is rarely covered by insurance: dental care, hearing aids, any sort of long-term care support services (community-based or institutional)… If the human condition includes a certain amount of physical disability throughout a lifetime, a morally ethical society would take our likely need for healthcare into account within the framework of human rights. I am not the only professional who has seen jaws drop as people who have paid for years into a system figure out that the gold-standard plans they paid into for years are more like lead: heavy, impenetrable, and toxic.
Back in 2012, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Harvard School of Public Health, and NPR released a study called “Sick in America” (https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/05/charts.pdf). It was not the first study of the issue, but it struck me at the time because of what I was seeing, and because the study compared perceptions of medical care and health insurance based on the illnesses and conditions people had experienced. For those who had chronic conditions requiring care for over a year, favorable responses dropped enormously.
Since that time, the COVID epidemic has brought healthcare concerns to the forefront. Several years past then, we have faced the burnout of medical staff, inflation, hospital closings, and an aging population that needs medical care more than ever. We are in trouble, and it has hit nearly all of us close to home. None of what I am saying here is new. The Affordable Care Act may well have eliminated exclusion to payment for pre-existing conditions, for example, but we never managed to remove the greed from the equation. Critics of single-payer systems have long pointed to the evil elements of a supposedly socialist health payment system, named them death panels who would restrict our care. The death panels are the insurers we have now. We all know this, and yet we remain complacent in our swallowing of what capitalism allows to trickle down to us.
I hate the fact that a man was murdered, and hate even more that a man was likely murdered to make a point about greed and the injustices in our healthcare system. Vengeful violence only perpetuates the system.
Many people feel completely helpless to faceless corporations and their enablers. Our country is suffering. The murder of Brian Thompson has highlighted the worst aspects of our country: gun violence and corporate greed. I hope that this time will be different, that changes will come to bring back a system that nurtures its citizens instead of perpetuating a class struggle.
We condemn human rights violations abroad so often, and we have so many freedoms and advantages in the United States. And still, more and more people find themselves locked out of rights because of financial struggles stemming from nothing more than the human condition. What more will it take for us to restore our humanity?
Aco Ico
This week, there have been a number of discussions around the penalties hospitals are now receiving for readmitting patients with certain conditions, and Medicare, within thirty days.
As I have stated before, I think this is a misguided practice, throwing gasoline–rather than water–on a fire that is already blazing. But of course, if we ignore the source of the fire to begin with, it looks as though we are all doing something!
Enter the Integrated Care Organizations and Accountable Care Organizations. Note the word care in these titles, for the focus–at least to me–is on the concept of integrated care, and efforts to coordinate services for people with chronic health conditions. This is most likely the key to preventing those readmissions, but of course, coordination is only possible when there is something there to coordinate.
I will spare you readers the rant this week over the lack of long-term care services. I suppose I could go on forever about that, even as I know the lack (and efforts to fill it) are on the radar of many others, as well.
The past week in the trenches was particularly hard. I am still a bit shaken at week’s end at the tragedies that come to my door every single week. Most of my referrals come from the hospitals, where I do not know how employees in the emergency departments and social work areas do not become completely overwhelmed with the sheer injustice of it all–they see it, in all the gruesome detail, daily. And I have the choice to say no, to walk away from situations that I find dangerous or inappropriate, never make that ethical choice to let go of life or to save it. Nonetheless, I remain shocked when I let myself, that this “greatest healthcare system in the world” bankrupts its customers–or our conception of healthcare’s role within government does.
I suppose that makes my views fairly clear. But if not, there is still time for discussion. Tomorrow I will be at the Massachusetts Home Care conference, hearing about ICOs and where we all may be headed in our thoughts around long-term care.
And after that, the Statewide Independent Living Council conference… Much to learn, much to ponder. More next Monday.
